自考专本|专升本|高升专|高升本|在职研究生-学历教育网

Previous

← Historians Throw the Book(s) at Google专科

Next

The Trouble With Temptation →

Is Obama History?

January 11, 2010, 9:29 am

By Tom Bartlett

George W. Bush liked to say that history would be the judge of his presidency. The idea being that history is written at some indeterminate point in the far-off future. How could we ever know what the historians would say? But, of course, they had already started weighing in on the Bush administration well before he left office (and often not all that favorably, either). Now, nearly a year into President Obama’s presidency, historians have some things to say about him, too.

There were, by my count, five sessions on President Obama at last week’s annual meeting of the American Historical Association. I caught two of them, listening to a half-dozen scholars propound on Obama and his policies. What struck me is that nearly every criticism of the president — and there were plenty — was followed by a caveat. He hasn’t had enough time in office. He’s had to deal with a terrible economy. The health care battle has overwhelmed the rest of his domestic agenda. And so forth.

One session was titled “What Has Obama Learned from History?” though it could have been called “What Obama Should Learn from History.” Historians had no shortage of advice for the president. Jason Scott Smith, an assistant professor of history at the University of New Mexico, argued that President Obama could learn the following lesson from FDR: Be bold. The most controversial policies can turn out to be the most popular, he said. Alice O’Connor, a professor of history at the University of California at Santa Barbara, praised the president for his appreciation of history, but said his administration was “strikingly deferential to the entrenched interests it’s trying to reform.”

On the foreign policy side, Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University, said Obama had more or less continued the Bush administration’s war on terror, while Elizabeth Cobbs Hoffman, a professor of foreign relations at San Diego State University, thought the president had yet to come up with a coherent foreign policy.

A session put on by Historians Against the War was called “Obama’s Troubling First Year: What Went Wrong, and What Can Historians Do About It?” But even with that unfavorable title, there was still a desire to cut Obama some slack. Margaret Power, an associate professor of history at the Illinois Institute of Technology, said it was up to historians and other citizens, not Obama, to lead a reform movement. And Nelson Lichtenstein, a professor of history at the University of California at Santa Barbara, said there was a 30-percent chance that Obama’s policies would shift to the left after the health care bill passed.

Hope springs eternal, or at least for a little while longer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Confirm Your Email Address

You must confirm the email address associated with your account to use this Chronicle feature.

If you have already confirmed your account, try your browser.

9 Responses to Is Obama History?

ronknott - January 11, 2010 at 4:13 pm

This column, and the content of others by the same writer, is placed rather oddly in the News tab of your website, especially when there is a section of your site for Opinion & Ideas, where this would be much more appropriately placed–unless the Chronicle has, like so many other journalistic entites of late, given up all pretense of trying to separate news and opinion.

lexalexander - January 11, 2010 at 4:26 pm

I haven’t gone looking for any other pieces by this writer, but this particularly column seems to be a fairly straightforward summary of what panelists at a meeting were saying. To the extent he leans toward opinion at all, it is in characterization of what he heard, not toward the nature of Obama’s presidency.Or am I missing something?

wmartin46 - January 11, 2010 at 4:40 pm

As to this advice to Obama: “Be bold!” .. Both Lenin and Hitler were “bold”. Certainly history speaks volumes about how each of their countries (and the world) suffered under “bold” leadership. Have historians learned nothing about what happens when leaders are “bold”?

ronknott - January 11, 2010 at 5:22 pm

To post #2: You are right in your summary, right up to the last sentence, which, as an apparent punch-line to the last comment of the previous paragraph, seems to say a lot.

1505847972	1256358232	1363884583	1902839745	800072298	754854002
中专升大专	中专升本科	高升专	高升本	专升本	自考